[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Multiple objectclass inheritance?

At 10:14 PM 4/19/01, dannyman wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 07:51:35AM +0200, Kimmo Myllyviita (LMF) wrote:
>> I'm defining a new objectclass, which I would like to be a subclass for
>> internetPerson but it should also use the dynamicObject objectclass. So is
>> this accurate definition for the superior classes: 
>> 
>> SUP (internetPerson $ dynamicObject) ???
>> 
>> I guess its not necessary to refer to dynamicObject in a definition, but my
>> objectclass shouldn't be used without it.
>
>Looks kosher to me.

But it may not be.  Note that a STRUCTURAL object class
cannot subclass from AUXILIARY object classes and AUXILIARY
object class cannot subclass from STRUCTURAL object classes.
2.0 doesn't enforce this, but other implementations do
and so will OpenLDAP eventually.

Kurt