[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: Anybody home?
I don't have much to add other than standard troublshooting tips. Try a
more simple experiment by eliminating all but a few object classes such as
"top" and "testGroup". I would also make testGroup a very simple object
class. The important thing is to get *something* working, and to slowly
morph it into what you need.
I doubt the other classes are interfering, but this will prove it. Add your
other object classes one at a time until it (possibly) breaks. This will at
least help you to notice any small differences, such as whitespace that you
may be overlooking.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
[mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Weston
Bustraan
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 10:19 AM
To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Cc: Gary Williams
Subject: RE: Anybody home?
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Gary Williams wrote:
> Yes, lots of people are getting it. You don't give a whole
> lot of information to help solve the problem, though. Try
> turning on logging and see if anything suggestive is reported.
>
Thanks for responding. I didn't know if my messages were going to
/dev/null or what. I figured at least someone would tell me I didn't give
enough information.
As far as turning on logging, it generates a flurry of messages, most of
which I have no clue about. I didn't think it was a good idea to post it
verbatim to the list.
What exactly am I looking for?
This particular search filter (objectClass=posixGroup) shouldn't be
uncommon, after all, nss_ldap uses it to look for groups. I would guess
lots of people are using it.