write acl for slave?

[Adam Shand <larry@spack.org>]

is there any reason that anyone needs write access to a slave server?
all changes will be forwarded to the master server via updateref, rather
then be served by the slave right?

so no one should ever have to (and thus be able to) write to a slave.
this seems a convenient way to make sure that your servers can't get out
of sync.  or at least guarenteeing that if they do that the master has the
authoritive copy.

correct?

adam.