[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Reloading ACLs

To: Vetle Roeim <vetle@opera.com>
Subject: Re: Reloading ACLs
From: GOMBAS Gabor <gombasg@inf.elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 18:44:37 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <yayelyjxuf4.fsf@tva.ifi.uio.no>; from vetle@opera.com on Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:29:19PM +0100
References: <yayk88bzekg.fsf@tva.ifi.uio.no> <978614444.3a5478ac1eb16@barracuda> <yay1yujzaii.fsf@tva.ifi.uio.no> <yayelyjxuf4.fsf@tva.ifi.uio.no>

On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:29:19PM +0100, Vetle Roeim wrote:

> Just to clarify; I'm wondering if it is feasible to implement
> reloading of ACLs, not if it's feasible to implement group-based
> access control.

I do not think so. If you want HA, then you should have at least one
replica anyway, so restarting one LDAP server should not be a problem
(and a restart takes just a few seconds).

If you are worried about failing updates when the master is down, work
on multimaster support instead. That would be much more useful.

Gabor

-- 
Gabor Gombas                                       Eotvos Lorand University
E-mail: gombasg@inf.elte.hu                        Hungary

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reloading ACLs
  - From: Vetle Roeim <vetle@opera.com>

References:
- Reloading ACLs
  - From: Vetle Roeim <vetle@opera.com>
- Re: Reloading ACLs
  - From: Adam Tauno Williams <adam@morrison-ind.com>
- Re: Reloading ACLs
  - From: Vetle Roeim <vetle@opera.com>
- Re: Reloading ACLs
  - From: Vetle Roeim <vetle@opera.com>

Prev by Date: What does the Indexing actually do?
Next by Date: RE: Apache LDAP - please
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread