[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
subtree searches not traversing multiple backends
I managed to find some messages in the archives pertaining to subtree
searches not traversing multiple backends, but was not able to determine
what was concluded if anything. To summarize, if I have two databases:
database ldbm
suffix "dc=cqg, dc=com"
database ldbm
suffix "dc=bld, dc=cqg, dc=com"
A subtree search with a base of "dc=cqg, dc=com" does NOT appear to search
in "dc=bld, dc=cqg, dc=com" as well. This is giving me great headaches
trying to implement a distributed email server environment. Are there any
plans to fix this? Is it even considered a problem to be fixed? (I'm not
even interested in referrals!)
Also, if I define the databases in the above order, I have trouble trying to
load the second one (or trying to search in the second one):
./sbin/slapadd -n 2 -l <ldif> -f <conf>
slapadd: database (dc=bld,dc=cqg,dc=com) not configured to hold
dn="dc=bld,dc=cqg,dc=com" (line=4)
If I comment out the first dabase, or if I reverse the order, it loads fine.
I'm running OpenLDAP 2.0.7.
- Orion
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Orion Poplawski, OPoplawski@cqg.com, Tel: (303) 440-4462x17, Fax: -4507
CQG, Inc., 250 Arapahoe Avenue, Boulder, CO 80302