[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: extensibleObjects



On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

> At 08:27 AM 11/8/00 +0100, Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:
> >On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> >
> >> At 02:24 PM 11/4/00 -0800, OpenLDAP Mailing list wrote:
> >> >Doesn't this defeat the purpose ?
> >> 
> >> No.  The purpose of extensible object is to allow user attributes
> >> to exist in an entry.  It purpose is not to disable appropriate
> >> handling of undefined attribute types.
> >
> >Is there no way you can create the attributeTypes dynamically similar to
> >the way you can create objectTypes?
> 
> A server may support dynamic update of subschema.  OpenLDAP doesn't.

Are there plans to add this functionality?

Hugo.

-- 
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ  Maasland
hvdkooij@caiw.nl	http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/
--------------------------------------------------------------
This message has not been checked and may contain harmfull content.