Re: Server-side sizelimit

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

At 05:06 PM 10/7/00 +0100, Philip Mayers wrote:
>Hmm. You're right, it's correct, but is it desireable to do that? I'd quite
>like (read - really like) no server-side sizelimit at all. Is this a major
>problem with OpenLDAP's structure, or should I begin looking at the source?

It should be fairly easy to change... have at it.



>Regards,
>Phil
>
>+----------------------------------+
>| Phil Mayers, Network Support     |
>| Centre for Computing Services    |
>| Imperial College                 |
>+----------------------------------+
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
>To: "Mayers, Philip J" <p.mayers@ic.ac.uk>
>Cc: "'openldap-software@openldap.org'" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
>Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 5:09 AM
>Subject: Re: Server-side sizelimit
>
>
>> At 12:02 PM 10/5/00 +0100, Mayers, Philip J wrote:
>> >I want to have no server-side sizelimit. Setting "sizelimit 0" in
>slapd.conf
>> >appears to allow no entries to be returned.
>>
>> Yes... I believe that's consistent with what the slapd.conf(5) says.
>>
>> >I've set it to a large value, but there must be a better way than that, I
>hope.
>>
>> Nope.
>>