[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: What is T.61 (Was: Chinese Character)
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> I try to add some references. I am sure RFC 1777 provides such.
But they're not very useful. The definitive reference is ITU T.61, but it's
no longer available (by the way, would someone please supply me a copy? I
would cheerfully pay for it). RFC 1345 contains the only useful definition
I've seen.
>> Guess when we convert to UTF8 (8 bit encoding of unicode)we can forget
>> about T.61.
>
> You can forget about T.61 if and when you forget about LDAPv2.
Or you can forget about T.61 if you use Netscape Directory Server, which
uses UTF-8 in LDAP v2.
> However, if you are deploying software which supports LDAPv2 and LDAPv3,
> you need to address T.61 vs UTF-8 encoded ISO 10646 charset issues. You
> will find that some LDAP implementations (correctly) use T.61 for LDAPv2
> and other implementations that (incorrectly) use UTF-8 encoded ISO 10646
> characters for LDAPv2.
Netscape, for example. Some other LDAP implementations use other charsets
in LDAP v2. For example, Microsoft Exchange Server uses the server's local
code page; for example, American and Western European Exchange Servers use
CP 1252 in LDAP v2.