[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: --with-threads=pth

To: "Brett G. Lemoine" <bl@incyte.com>
Subject: Re: --with-threads=pth
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <kurt@boolean.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 09:44:49 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <199910251611.JAA530127@blah.incyte.com>
References: <Your message of "Mon, 25 Oct 1999 08:54:25 PDT." <3.0.5.32.19991025085425.0099fba0@localhost>

At 09:11 AM 10/25/99 -0700, Brett G. Lemoine wrote:
>> We have native support for GNU Pth implemented in devel.  This
>> has yet be ported to 1.2.
>
>So, without some serious mucking about, I'm not going to be able
>to use Pth in 1.2.7 on a solaris box?

Apparently so.

>> > or is pth something that really isn't recommended?
>> 
>> It's recommended on those systems where GNU Pth can provide
>> working Pthread emulation.
>
>Is solaris known to be such a system?

No.  GNU Pth (or others) cannot easily provide alternative pthread
implementations (or emulation) on Solaris 7 due to problems
with system headers.

>What I'm hoping for is diffs/config options that'll get me started on
>compiling openldap 1.2.7 with GNU's Pth.

It's hoped that someone will port our native GNU Pth support from
devel to 1.2 soon.

Kurt

----
Kurt D. Zeilenga		<kurt@boolean.net>
Net Boolean Incorporated	<http://www.boolean.net/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: --with-threads=pth
  - From: wesley.craig@umich.edu

References:
- Re: --with-threads=pth
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <kurt@boolean.net>
- Re: --with-threads=pth
  - From: "Brett G. Lemoine" <bl@incyte.com>

Prev by Date: RE: No object found.....
Next by Date: Re: --with-threads=pth
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread