[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: libldap_r
Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> writes:
> The benefit is decreasing the number of libraries that need to be
> maintained, and eliminating the conflict when code linked against one
> library is dynamically loaded into a process that was already linked
> with the other.
Indeed, Debian has been trying to use only libldap_r for some time because
of the latter issue, and we would love to throw out the way we're handling
that in favor of adopting a maintained and supported build configuration.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>