masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote:
pcache has been working fine without explicit support of these so far, and they're not critical to the current work. I'm not opposed to someone adding these later, but I don't have time for them right now.Please, consider it food for thoughts.
Certainly. I think it would be more interesting to use them in the syncrepl code first, though. The syncrepl engine is intended to work with other mechanisms after all; we could start by fleshing out the retro-changelog consumer code. (At this point I think all that's needed is to omit the requirement of a syncrepl control on each response.)
-- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/