----- "Michael Ströder" <michael@stroeder.com> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and
earlier)
> information that is completely obsolete. It would be nice to be
able to
> archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use.
> Thoughts on how best to achieve this?
Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are
not of
such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain
an archive.
Ciao, Michael.
It's not supported by the project I think, so should be just deleted.