[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Please test RE24 (3/18/2009 call for testing)

To: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: Please test RE24 (3/18/2009 call for testing)
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:12:19 -0700
Cc: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>, openldap-devel@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0903190934350.11790@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
References: <9D04CFE386FB65A3F2335CC5@[192.168.1.199]> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0903190934350.11790@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090317 SeaMonkey/2.0a1pre Firefox/3.0.3

Aaron Richton wrote:

Is something improperly ordered during teardowns?
[6] ldap_pvt_thread_pool_destroy(tpool = 0x39c374, run_pending = 1), line 570 in "tpool.c"
https://www.nbcs.rutgers.edu/~richton/slapd.log.20090319.bz2

Same issue we ran into earlier, the consumer info has been freed but there's still a consumer task queued in the thread pool. I had already changed things around to avoid this but obviously haven't totally prevented it. Should be fixed now in HEAD.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Please test RE24 (3/18/2009 call for testing)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Please test RE24 (3/18/2009 call for testing)
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Please test RE24 (3/18/2009 call for testing)
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH for make test
Next by Date: Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH for make test
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread