Re: Please test RE24

[Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>]

Howard Chu wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote:
> > The consumer seems to be OK in general - it ignores the NEW_COOKIE if it's
> > equal to or older than its current ctxcsn. However, I've now seen another case
> > where a consumer receives the NEW_COOKIE message from one provider before it
> > has received the real update from any providers. So again, when the real
> > update arrives, it is ignored.
>
> Appears to be the ITS#5973 patch, not 5972.

Reverting the syncrepl part of the ITS#5973 patch appears to let test050 pass 
for me now. But looking at the logs, there are a lot of NEW_COOKIE messages 
being sent (and there ought to be none in this scenario). Also, I'm seeing a 
lot of entries propagated without any CSN in the sync cookie. The results look 
correct, but there's still something flaky here.

--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/