[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RE24 testing

To: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: RE24 testing
From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:46:17 +0100
Cc: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0809101824090.24941@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
Organization: OpenLDAP Project
References: <4BE118E4A46213877834BF20@[192.168.1.199]> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0809101824090.24941@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707)

Aaron Richton wrote:

Would it be prudent to make these tests with BDB 4.7, or do you have reason to believe that's premature?


So 4.2 is dropped?

checking db.h usability... yes
checking db.h presence... yes
checking for db.h... yes
checking for Berkeley DB major version... 4
checking for Berkeley DB minor version... 2
checking for Berkeley DB link (-ldb-4.2)... yes
checking for Berkeley DB version match... yes
checking for Berkeley DB thread support... yes
checking Berkeley DB version for BDB/HDB backends... no
configure: error: BDB/HDB: BerkeleyDB version incompatible
make: *** No rule to make target `depend'.  Stop.
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
make: *** No rule to make target `test'.  Stop.

If it is, the following should say no right?

checking for Berkeley DB version match... yes
checking for Berkeley DB thread support... yes


--
Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry.
OpenLDAP Engineering Team.

E ghenry@OpenLDAP.org

Community developed LDAP software.

http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RE24 testing
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: RE24 testing
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- RE24 testing
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: RE24 testing
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: slapd fails an assertion
Next by Date: Re: RE24 testing
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread