Re: LDAP transactions

[Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>]

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Syncrepl was untenable with non-serialized updates (which moving to 
> delta-syncrepl helped with).  Even in a standalone setup, I find that 
> serializing the update process provides faster write times (at least 
> with back-(bh)db) than allowing multiple update threads.

But with transaction support there could be lots of modifications in one 
transaction which could prevent other LDAP clients from proceeding for 
an unacceptable amount of time if you serialize all transactions.

Ciao, Michael.