[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: thread pools, performance

To: OpenLDAP-devel@openldap.org
Subject: Re: thread pools, performance
From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:45:36 -0600
In-reply-to: <4725D81A.2010804@OpenLDAP.org>
References: <4718321A.60207@symas.com> <4719E4D6.1090307@symas.com> <471AD1F3.4060407@boreham.org> <471AF4CF.3000308@symas.com> <471CD358.4020802@hp.com> <4721A81C.7090709@symas.com> <47233031.1050802@symas.com> <472457AC.9090505@symas.com> <4725D81A.2010804@OpenLDAP.org>

Gavin Henry wrote:

Thanks for all this Howard. It certainly makes it clear where OpenLDAP lies in the LDAP world (looking down from the top and around at everyone else ;-) ).

Hmm...not so sure about the 'everyone' part because I added this feature (parallel import with correctly implemented partent/child entry interlocking) to the product that is now SunDS and FedoraDS in 1999.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@OpenLDAP.org>

References:
- ITS#4943 tpool.c, thread pools
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: thread pools, performance
  - From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: thread pools, performance
Next by Date: Re: thread pools, performance
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread