[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?

To: ando@sys-net.it
Subject: Re: authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:59:24 +0200
Cc: Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>, openldap-devel@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <1072.151.24.82.206.1184495187.squirrel@151.24.82.206>
References: <55715.212.159.59.85.1184453991.squirrel@webmail.suretecsystems.com> <1072.151.24.82.206.1184495187.squirrel@151.24.82.206>

Pierangelo Masarati writes:
> AFAIK, the attribute and so is recognized, but it's not implemented
> (nor won't, as it is no longer needed).

If it's no longer needed - what has changed?  I thought it was invented
because the existing scheme of '{hash method}' in userPassword broke the
LDAP standard.  Which it still does.  Not that six years of none of us
bothering to implement RFC 3112 gives much hope of that changing.
-- 
Regards,
Hallvard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?
  - From: Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

References:
- authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?
  - From: "Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>
- Re: authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Re: authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?
Next by Date: Re: authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread