Re: cn=include

[Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>]

Howard Chu wrote:
> Eric Irrgang wrote:
>> Since
>> 1) the behavior is different
>> 2) the slapd.conf to cn=config conversion sucks in the relevant
>> information anyway
>> and
>> 3) use of includes is inappropriate under cn=config
>> is it maybe time for the slap* tools stop creating cn=Includes?
> 
> The conversion creates them to document their existence. In fact after a
> conversion, when slapd starts up from a slapd.d, the cn=Include records
> are ignored.

Howard, I also think this is confusing. I'd propose to drop cn=Includes
completely. There is no point to document their existence since, as you
explained, the order is not preserved.

Ciao, Michael.