[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: PATCH: back-sock

To: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: back-sock
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:01:59 -0700
Cc: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>, Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <20051015101912.GA23333@uk.tiscali.com>
References: <20051013095819.GA11613@uk.tiscali.com> <434E3935.5010307@symas.com> <hbf.20051013t51y@bombur.uio.no> <20051013151931.GD12585@uk.tiscali.com> <434E9CE1.2030405@symas.com> <hbf.20051013nez1@bombur.uio.no> <20051015101912.GA23333@uk.tiscali.com>

At 03:19 AM 10/15/2005, Brian Candler wrote:
>plus an indication of whether TLS is in use 

Somewhat meaningless as the protections offered is
dependent on the cipher suite negotiated.  Passing
the combined (TLS+SASL) SSF would be better.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: back-sock
  - From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>

References:
- PATCH: back-sock
  - From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
- Re: PATCH: back-sock
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: PATCH: back-sock
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: PATCH: back-sock
  - From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
- Re: PATCH: back-sock
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: PATCH: back-sock
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: PATCH: back-sock
  - From: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: Re: PATCH: back-sock
Next by Date: Re: PATCH: back-sock
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread