[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Move SLAPI in an overlay...
>
>>>We do, see slapi_over_response() in slapi/slapi_overlay.c (formerly
>>>slapi_op_response()).
>>
>>I see. I wonder if calling slapi_int_call_plugins() without placing the
>>original bd_info and be_private is appropriate.
>
> I think a better solution, which I have working now, is to have
> access_allowed() call frontendDB->bd_info->bi_access_allowed()
> (which is ordinarily slap_access_allowed()) in the case that
> the backend did not provide a bi_access_allowed implementation.
>
> That allows global overlays to implement ACL checking.
but this is not working, because the BackendDB data loses information
about the rootdn, the per-backend ACLs and so (for instance, test002 is no
longer working...). I'll back out acl.c:1.280 until we find a better
solution.
p.
--
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497