[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: cn=anonymous

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: cn=anonymous
From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:48:06 +0200
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=sys-net.it; c=simple; q=dns; b=joZwLRKlsi8KqDTyqkPv+ThyST87pAaOaYUCa5rGShUpyaasnxVpix4In3GfCkj+a weJZbDfePz85ZQd0iKF6Q==
In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.0.20050512231345.07f9db80@mail.openldap.org>
References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050512231345.07f9db80@mail.openldap.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050209 LPT-Desktop/1.7.5-3.9.el3.lpt

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

I'd like to replace "cn=anonymous" with "". The empty DN is generally used to refer to anonymous in LDAP, seems best to continue that. Testing shows no problems, but wonder if there are hidden dependencies in slapd(8) on "cn=anonymous"? Comments?

As far as I remember "cn=anonymous" is essentially (non-consistently) used in rendering "", for instance in some monitoring and so. I'd agree in experimenting for a while and seeing what happens.

p.


   SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497

References:
- cn=anonymous
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: cn=anonymous
Next by Date: Re: Free Attribute with dummy empty values
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread