[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ACL_DISCLOSE

To: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
Subject: Re: ACL_DISCLOSE
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:11:02 -0700
Cc: OpenLDAP Devel <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <4256FA64.10106@sys-net.it>
References: <4256FA64.10106@sys-net.it>

#unifdef -DSLAP_ACL_HONOR_DISCLOSE

At 02:40 PM 4/8/2005, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>Kurt,
>
>ACL_DISCLOSE is only partially implemented; however, I see that in few portions of code (I noticed it in back-ldbm, but there might be more) it is used to check that access privilege outside #ifdef SLAP_ACL_HONOR_DISCLOSE.  I can't remember if this is intended, i.e. the current implementation is using ACL_DISCLOSE unconditionally, or all its occurrences should still be conditioned.
>
>p.
>
>
>   SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497

References:
- ACL_DISCLOSE
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: ACL_DISCLOSE
Next by Date: Moving backends to table-driven config...
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread