Re: 2.2 bdb leaks?

[Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <raster@valinux.co.jp>]

On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:05:01 -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
babbled:

> 
> 
> --On Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:08 PM +0900 Carsten Haitzler 
> <raster@valinux.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > ok... someone please tell me i'm wrong.
> >
> > i have a 500,000 entry (inetorgperson) db - sot its big enough (for
> > testing)... and i'm playing with improving bdb/hdb... and i seem to find
> > it seems to allocate ram... till the cows come home.
> >
> > basicalyl i have set the cachesize to 10 (and idlcachesize to 8)... i keep
> > querying for items from a client (going thru uid 0 and up numerically)
> > and slapd just keeps allocating ram... and allocating.. and allocating.
> > (dmalloc, valgrind, memprof side checks)... this smells wrong to me. if i
> > keep querying eventually i get slapd to be using > 1gb of ram...
> >
> > something smells wrong - just to save me hunting for something i should
> > be.. is this right? why? shouldn't it level out at keeping 100 entries in
> > the cache and thats it? that means memory use should have leveled out
> > after the cache fills?
> >
> > (hunting for more "culprits" that could be the issue) just wondering if
> > i'm barking up the wrong tree here.?
> 
> What version of 2.2 are you using, that would help...
> 
> Note that 2.2.19 had some memory leak & cache leak fixes.

2.2 head (ie the 2.2 release branch in cvs) (OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_2)

ok - so it is possible i'm seeing a known bug? (i just don't want to be chasing
ghosts). is this fixed in cvs? if so i may either be seeing something new (i'll
hunt and patch)...

-- 
----------------------- VA Linux Systems Japan ----------------------
Carsten Haitzler (Raster)           raster@valinux.co.jp
カークン (数田)                     raster@rasterman.com
Ph: +81 3 3293 5151                 Fax: +81 3 3293 5152