[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
openldapaci versus userCertificate;binary
- To: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: openldapaci versus userCertificate;binary
- From: Harald Jung <jung@ecos.de>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:05:49 +0200
- Content-disposition: inline
- Organization: ecos
- User-agent: KMail/1.5.4
Hello,
In the current releases i am not able to set an attribute list including
attributes like cACertificate;binary or userCertificate;binary for example.
Leaving the ;binary type away in the openldapaci attribute list, has the
effect that the requested attributnames won't match together.
Otherwise the ';' hurts the openldapaci syntax and the whole aci definition
doesn't work.
Is there a solution/fix to the problem which comes with this scenario?
My idea for a workaround is to patch the source code that the definition
userCertificate:binary in the aci attribute list will match against
userCertificate;binary.
I don't know if it would make more sense that a attribute definition without
the ;binary type in the aci object should match.
The first example won't break no rules (afaik).
greetings
Harald