[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: unifdef -UNEW_LOGGING

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: unifdef -UNEW_LOGGING
From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:18:06 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <6.0.1.1.0.20040718092033.049ad200@127.0.0.1>
References: <6.0.1.1.0.20040718092033.049ad200@127.0.0.1>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1

> Anyone care?

Honestly, I don't remember having used it.  Only, I note that in few
points the NEW_LOGGING format is better (more info/better formatting) than
the traditional.  I usually try to make them uniform whenever I happen to
touch code, maybe this could be a good cahnge to do this consistently.

p.

-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it


    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497

References:
- unifdef -UNEW_LOGGING
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd backend.c backover.c proto-slap.h
Next by Date: Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd backend.c backover.c proto-slap.h
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread