Re: socket instead of replog file

[Roland Bauerschmidt <rb@debian.org>]

st3 wrote:
> this, in order not to have slurpd to scan the replog file every n seconds
> (even if since openldap 2.2.8 n is configurable and i patched it to have
> n expressed in milliseconds - should i commit this patch?) and then
> decreasing the load on the filesystem and eventually have fully realtime
> replicas

You could use a file notification (if available) instead. You might also
want to check if syncrepl fulfills your demands (if you haven't done so
already).

Roland