Re: Check for updatedn (Was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/overlays rwm.c)

["Jong" <jongchoi@OpenLDAP.org>]

vote for making it as a new wrapper (like is_update_dn(op)) or add flags to
be_isupdate(op). We may need them individually.
Or, how about using sl / sr prefix to names referring to slurpd / syncrepl ?
sth like be_sl_isupdate(op), be_sr_isupdate(op), and be_isupdate(op) for
both.....
- Jong-Hyuk

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
To: <jongchoi@OpenLDAP.org>
Cc: <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:11 PM
Subject: Check for updatedn (Was: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/overlays rwm.c)


> > updatedn fix for syncrepl
>
> What about introducing a new wrapper like
> is_update_dn( op ) that checks whether
> the o_ndn field is allowed to update, or
> add this functionality to the be_isupdate()
> wrapper, or add flags to be_isupdate()?
>
> I think the same couple of calls will
> almost always appear in the same places.
>
> Ciao, Ando.
>
> -- 
> Pierangelo Masarati
> mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
>
>
>
>