RE: Proxycache Documentation

["Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Voglmaier, Reinhard Erich [mailto:rv33100@gsk.com]

> I've read carefully the post of Kumar. I have also defined
> the attribute set.

Not carefully enough. You should break your example down step by step, then
the answer is quite obvious.

> proxyAttrset 0 mail sn givenName telephoneNumber
> proxyTemplate (sn=) 0 3600
>
> Therefore the search (sn=Voglma*) mail sn givenName telephoneNumber
>
> Results: cacheable.
>
> The search (sn=Voglm*) mail therefore should be answerable
> from the cache.
> Is this correct or do I misunderstand the documentation ?

Quoting Kumar's post:

>>A query Q, with requested attribute set S and filter F is answered by a
>>cached query Q' with attribute set S' and filter F' if:

>>(i) "proxyAttrset  S" appears in the proxy overlay definition.
>>(ii) S is either same or a subset of S'.

The situation is this:

You have a cached query Q': (sn=Voglma*)
with the attrset S': mail sn givenName telephoneNumber

And then you follow with a query Q: (sn=Voglma*)
with attrs S: mail

By rule (i) above, 'mail' must be defined in a proxyAttrset directive of its
own. If it is not defined, then the query will not be matched in the cache.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howard Chu [mailto:hyc@highlandsun.com]
> Sent: venerdì 26 marzo 2004 12.05
> To: Voglmaier, Reinhard Erich
> Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: RE: Proxycache Documentation
>
>
> No, upon further investigation I concluded that the code is working as
> designed. Please re-read Apurva Kumar's post. You must have
> the attribute
> sets explicitly defined.
> http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200403/msg00083.html
>
>   -- Howard Chu
>   Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
>   http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
>   Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
> > [mailto:owner-openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Voglmaier,
> > Reinhard Erich
> > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 2:18 AM
> > To: 'Howard Chu'; ando@sys-net.it
> > Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
> > Subject: RE: Proxycache Documentation
> >
> >
> > Howard,
> >
> > Should it be fixed just in the release 2.2.7 ?
> > I ask coz I have the same problem with the new release.
> Should I make
> > a bug report ?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Reinhard
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Howard Chu [mailto:hyc@highlandsun.com]
> > Sent: venerdì 19 marzo 2004 9.35
> > To: Voglmaier, Reinhard Erich; ando@sys-net.it
> > Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
> > Subject: RE: Proxycache Documentation
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Voglmaier, Reinhard Erich [mailto:rv33100@gsk.com]
> >
> > > I'm not quite sure what I should do, kinda it's a bug or
> a feature ?
> > >
> > > For example, the doc does not speak about query containment. (
> > > actually the paper the docs points to does, however the
> syntax it's
> > > using is different from the actual used one )
> > >
> > > If I cash a query that has brings back "sn, cn,
> > telephoneNumber, mail"
> > > and make a new query asking only for "sn, cn"   ( other stuff
> > > remains the
> > > same, obviously )
> > > Should this be answered from the cache or not ?
> > > Query containment should mean it comes from the cache,
> > actually it's
> > > not answerable ( info from the log file ).
> > > Is this a bug, or is this ok ?

  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
  http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support