* Andreas (andreas@conectiva.com.br) wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:17:23AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > On Linux you can just use symbol versioning and have just a > > 'libldap.so.2'. Many of these problems are because of ancient unixes > > Yes, but that name is already taken by the openldap-2.1.x branch. That wouldn't matter- libldap.so.2 would support the 2.1.x branch and the 2.2.x branch. > > As I understand it the problem here is quite simple- libtool sucks and > > is busted and can't handle that. If libtool could handle it that'd > > certainly be nicer. > > I sort of agree. I gave up trying to understand what parameters I have to pass to > libtool in order to get a nice libfoo.so.1.2.3 name structure. I don't believe it's possible to convince libtool to do that. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature