RE: Overlay Documentation

["Voglmaier, Reinhard Erich" <rv33100@gsk.com>]

I'm not quite sure what I should do, kinda it's a bug or a feature ?

For example, the doc does not speak about query containment. ( actually the
paper the docs points to does, however the syntax it's using is different
from the actual used one )

If I cash a query that has brings back "sn, cn, telephoneNumber, mail"
and make a new query asking only for "sn, cn"   ( other stuff remains the
same, obviously )
Should this be answered from the cache or not ?
Query containment should mean it comes from the cache, actually it's not
answerable ( info from the log file ). 
Is this a bug, or is this ok ? 

These are the things I miss in the admin guide. 
Again, I would volunteer to contribute to the documentation . . .

Reinhard


-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Chu [mailto:hyc@highlandsun.com] 
Sent: giovedì 18 marzo 2004 18.16
To: ando@sys-net.it; Voglmaier, Reinhard Erich
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: RE: Overlay Documentation


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org 
> [mailto:owner-openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Pierangelo 
> Masarati

> > I posted a suggestion about the "proxy cache" chapter in the issue 
> > tracking system some time ago. In the meantime I played around with 
> > the overlay cache. I
> found out that
> > documentation is not very aligned with what the sw is
> actually doing.
> > Therefore I would propose to review the chapter in order to align it 
> > more to the actual release.

At this point any difference betwen the code and the doc must be a bug in
the code, because the doc looks right to me... Please point out the
inconsistencies in an ITS report.