[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: back-relay

To: <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: back-relay
From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:36:04 +0100 (CET)
Cc: <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <6.0.1.1.0.20040317151615.04fc0f00@127.0.0.1>
References: <65006.81.72.89.40.1079482189.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it> <62273.81.72.89.40.1079564123.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it> <6.0.1.1.0.20040317151615.04fc0f00@127.0.0.1>

> Can we rewrite the operation differently for different authzDNs?
> (as I think I know the answer, you can take this more as a suggestion
> than a question)

This is something I already wanted to look at.  I guess there should
be no particular problem, though ...

Ando.

-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it

References:
- back-relay
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: back-relay
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: back-relay
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: HEADS UP (Was: OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_2 ...)
Next by Date: Re: back-relay
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread