[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: subinitial and subfinal indexes not working?
As the 2.0 release is pretty much dead, there's not much point in trying to
track this problem down in that source. If you can verify that the same
problem occurs in 2.1, please file an ITS for it.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Andreas
> I'm running an instance of openldap-2.0.27 and it seems that the
> subinitial and subfinal indexes are not working.
>
> All for searches correctly return the same 4 entries, but with
> varying degrees of speed (the database contains about 170k entries):
>
> # time ldapsearch cn="jose roberto silva" > /dev/null
> real 0m0.108s
> user 0m0.010s
> sys 0m0.000s
>
> # time ldapsearch cn="*jose roberto silva*" > /dev/null
> real 0m0.123s
> user 0m0.010s
> sys 0m0.010s
>
> cn is indexed as follows:
> index cn eq,subinitial,subany,subfinal
>
> I had "sub" earlier, same result.
>
> Now, the following two searches take minutes to complete:
>
> # time ldapsearch cn="*jose roberto silva" > /dev/null
> real 1m49.929s
> user 0m0.010s
> sys 0m0.010s
>
> # time ldapsearch cn="jose roberto silva*" > /dev/null
> real 1m49.940s
> user 0m0.020s
> sys 0m0.010s
>
> Seems there is a problem with the subinitial and subfinal indexes, any
> hints? I *think* this also happens with openldap-2.1.21, but I'll try
> again later just to be sure.
>