[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: openldap-2.1.16: what happened to cache.c?

To: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: openldap-2.1.16: what happened to cache.c?
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:30:10 -0800
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <20030329212106.GD24455@conectiva.com.br>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030328072307.028df188@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030320105929.02056e50@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030314130323.01a5d138@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030314130323.01a5d138@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030320105929.02056e50@127.0.0.1> <5.2.0.9.0.20030328072307.028df188@127.0.0.1>

At 01:21 PM 3/29/2003, Andreas wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 07:31:52AM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>> > Shouldn't it be bumped then?
>> I care more that non-broken applications will automatically
>> pick up important bug fixes in non-deprecated library routines.
>In other words, openldap can't and won't guarantee compatibility between
>minor releases of the library.

The project cannot guarantee that all problems will be
discovered during releasing engineering.   As I said in
my first post on this thread, if this particular problem
had been discovered prior to release, things likely would
have been a little different.

Kurt

References:
- Re: openldap-2.1.16: what happened to cache.c?
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: openldap-2.1.16: what happened to cache.c?
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: openldap-2.1.16: what happened to cache.c?
  - From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>

Prev by Date: Re: openldap-2.1.16: what happened to cache.c?
Next by Date: Re: openldap-2.1.16: what happened to cache.c?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread