[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: ltdl vs. dlfcn & so

To: hyc@highlandsun.com
Subject: RE: ltdl vs. dlfcn & so
From: Luke Howard <lukeh@PADL.COM>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 21:58:05 +1100
Cc: ando@sys-net.it, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
Organization: PADL Software Pty Ltd
Versions: dmail (bsd44) 2.4c/makemail 2.9d

>Please just use libltdl, that's what it's for - to hide platform
>dependencies. Introducing our own set of macros and #ifdef's completely
>defeats the purpose.

Not knowing libltdl well, in which case is the module_LTX_function()
nomenclature required? 

It would be nice to maintain SLAPI ABI compatability with Netscape,
or at least _try_ to (there are a few differences such as the 
different slapi_ch_free() prototypes).

-- Luke

--
Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com

Prev by Date: slapi_ch_free()
Next by Date: Re: slapi_ch_free()
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread