[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Suggestion: attribute;search

To: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Subject: Re: Suggestion: attribute;search
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 19:45:43 -0800
Cc: ando@sys-net.it, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <HBF.20021106f3pc@bombur.uio.no>
References: <34308.131.175.154.56.1036585256.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it> <E189OqY-0000Ib-00@urg.uio.no> <34308.131.175.154.56.1036585256.squirrel@webmail.sys-net.it>

How about ;lang-x-hidden and some ACLs?  No coding required.

Kurt

At 06:19 AM 2002-11-06, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Pierangelo Masarati writes:
>> What about ";x-search" ?
>
>Right, good catch.  Non-standardized options should have an "x-" prefix.
>
>BTW, maybe ;x-hidden is better, since it is reads and not search filters
>which treat it specially.  (Modify operations would have to see it.)
>
>Also, I guess there should be an LDAP control which says that the
>search should return those attributes anyway.
>
>-- 
>Hallvard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suggestion: attribute;search
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

References:
- Re: Suggestion: attribute;search
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- Suggestion: attribute;search
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: Suggestion: attribute;search
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: Re: Suggestion: attribute;search
Next by Date: Re: Suggestion: attribute;search
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread