[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slapd crash

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>, Lawrence Greenfield <leg+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: slapd crash
From: Simon Wilkinson <sxw@sxw.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:28:41 +0100
Cc: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020709210608.03f69ce0@127.0.0.1>
References: <001701c22379$6d413480$432fe7d8@myhost> <5.1.0.14.0.20020709210608.03f69ce0@127.0.0.1>

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 05:34, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> Same here.  That is, we assume the Kerberos V library is
> threadsafe.  Heimdal works.

>From discussion on the krbdev list, the MIT Kerberos library is definitely 
_not_ thread safe, even when built with -D_REENTRANT_. Some folk are working 
on patches to make it safe, providing only one thread uses a particular 
Kerberos context at any one time, but the timescale for these is unclear.

Cheers,

Simon.


-- 
Simon Wilkinson            <simon@sxw.org.uk>          http://www.sxw.org.uk
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught
and shot now." - Zaphod (Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy)

References:
- RE: slapd crash
  - From: "Glenn Case" <ldap@glennc.net>
- Re: slapd crash
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Security Audit of OpenLDAP 2.0.23
Next by Date: RE: simple paged results ( rfc2696 ) - has anyone look at this?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread