[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ValuesReturnFilter implementation

At 08:09 AM 2002-02-26, Mikhail Sahalaev wrote:
>Kurt,
>I'm implementing valuesReturnFilter control ( draft-ldapext-matchedval-05.txt). You so my design draft were I wrote :
>
>"do_search() should pass one more parameter to *_back_search() wich will be the
>pointer to valuesReturnFilter or NULL if control does not exist in operation.
>Backend search functions have to pass pointer to valuesReturnFilter futher to
>send_seach_entry()."
>
>You answered tgat it's a bad idea and I should rather add on more field to "be" structure. Am I right? I'm asking becouse from your letter it was not really clear what structure I should extend.

I likely was referring to the Operation (op) structure.

Kurt