[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: partial replication of entries/attributes

To: "Pierangelo Masarati" <masarati@aero.polimi.it>
Subject: RE: partial replication of entries/attributes
From: "Howard Chu" <hyc@highlandsun.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 02:41:05 -0800
Cc: "Randall S. Winchester" <rsw@sendmail.com>, <openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3C63A502.516F1FBC@aero.polimi.it>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: masarati@carnelian.propagation.net
> [mailto:masarati@carnelian.propagation.net]On Behalf Of Pierangelo
> Masarati
 
> Good job, although it's going to give a lot of headaches:
> if one entry is stripped some attributes but all the values
> of objectclass pass, then it may be broken; would you consider
> this a problem (e.g. no replica even of those info that were 
> allowed) or a feature (the test didn't pass so it was a success)?

I suddenly realized that I had completely missed your point before.
Yes, this is a problem. I haven't thought about how I will fix it yet.

  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
  http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support

References:
- Re: partial replication of entries/attributes
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <masarati@aero.polimi.it>

Prev by Date: RE: partial replication of entries/attributes
Next by Date: extensible matching rule problem
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread