[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ber_memalloc size distribution of back-ldbm
At 07:05 PM 2001-10-25, Jonghyuk Choi wrote:
>ber_memalloc(1024)=100004
Looks like you are testing OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2 (or some
release). HEAD would likely be similar, except that
this would likely read:
ber_memalloc(1000)=100004
I adjusted the lber bufsize to be slightly below the 2^10
so not to force a 2^11 block from getting used when the
system allocator uses binary buddy. From your numbers,
looks like we could drop this to a 2^9 block.