[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ber_memalloc size distribution of back-ldbm



At 07:05 PM 2001-10-25, Jonghyuk Choi wrote:
>ber_memalloc(1024)=100004

Looks like you are testing OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2 (or some
release).  HEAD would likely be similar, except that
this would likely read:

ber_memalloc(1000)=100004

I adjusted the lber bufsize to be slightly below the 2^10
so not to force a 2^11 block from getting used when the
system allocator uses binary buddy.   From your numbers,
looks like we could drop this to a 2^9 block.