[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: back-bdb (Was: Back up Berkeley dbb files may cause file corruption)
- To: openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Re: back-bdb (Was: Back up Berkeley dbb files may cause file corruption)
- From: Marijn Meijles <marijn@bitpit.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:01:45 +0200
- In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20010925162141.016ac838@127.0.0.1>
- References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010925141914.016dac68@127.0.0.1> <002c01c14601$dbd58640$7601a8c0@fiddle.symas.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20010925141914.016dac68@127.0.0.1> <20010926000723.A23231@unox.athome.tue.nl> <5.1.0.14.0.20010925162141.016ac838@127.0.0.1>
You wrote:
> At 03:07 PM 2001-09-25, Marijn Meijles wrote:
> >I'm wondering, what needs to be done before back-bdb is finished?
> >only indexing?
>
> No, entry caching is absent. Also, select changes to
> back-ldbm need to ported to back-bdb. And likely other
> loose ends...
>
entry caching? back-bdb has transactions, so why not leave the caching (and
locking) to bdb?
--
Marijn@bitpit.net
---
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?