[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: back-bdb

At 09:11 AM 3/22/01 +0100, Markus Storm wrote:
>is anyone still working on back-bdb?
>Looks like Kurt was almost there, but got stuck.

I'm not stuck, just busy.

>The CVS code just needs a finish of the index implementation; if not
>using indices, it already works.

I got some half written "new" code which implements indices for
back-bdb.  The "new" part of the code is that when ALLIDS
is exceeded, ranges of I-Ds are maintained to reduce the
number of entries which need to be checked.  

>I think a transactionally safe backend is what everyone is waiting for,
>isn't it?

One of many things...