[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [Fwd: sUffixAlias]

At 08:04 PM 12/5/00 +0100, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
>let's say, change the bottom part of it only, the least significant from the user's
>standpoint but the most significant from the server's standpoint, maybe.

The whole value is provided by the user.  The server is obligated
not to muck with it.

A virtual view, or maybe more appropriately named a virtual naming
context would be values provided to it by a virtual user which
would derive values from another naming context.  Hence, the
X.500 "user" attribute value model would be maintained.

Kurt