[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: help about aci]
Hi!
Thanks for your answer. It is almost working. :(
ldapmodify -D 'cn=manager,o=sonera,c=fi' -w secret
dn: cn=+358408308432,ou=pcm,o=sonera,c=fi
add: OpenLDAPaci
OpenLDAPaci:
1.2.3.4#entry#grant;r,w;[all]#access-id#cn=phoenix,ou=admin,o=sonera,c=fi
modifying entry "cn=+358408308432,ou=pcm,o=sonera,c=fi"
ldap_modify: Inappropriate matching
additional info: modify: add values failed
ldif_record() = 18
? What can cause that problem?
regards: Szelei Gabor
kurash@sassafras.com wrote:
>
> The aci syntax OpenLDAP currently uses is not like that described in
> the latest IETF draft, although it started out that way. Here is a
> basic example of what is currently implemented:
>
> 1.2.3.4#entry#grant;r,w;theAttr#access-id#cn=phoenix,ou=admin,o=sonera,c=fi
>
> Check out servers/slapd/acl.c (search for "oid#") for a more generic
> template. The attribute type that has been defined for this is
> OpenLDAPaci, so your ldif file should have:
>
> dn: cn=+358408308432,ou=pcm,o=sonera,c=fi
> add: OpenLDAPaci
> OpenLDAPaci: 1.2.3.4#entry#...
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Mark.
>
> >I would like to use aci access control method. I know is experimental
> >and undocumented yet.
> >I use OpenLDAP 2.0.6 with aci feature enabled. Which type of attribe
> >should I use? What ietf draft should I follow for the proper syntax?
> >
> >from slapd -d 65535:
> >line 79 (access to * by self write by aci=OpenLDAPaci write by
> >dn.exact="cn=admin,ou=admin,o=sonera,c=fi" write by * read)
> >Backend ACL: access to *
> > by self write (=wrscx)
> > by aci=OpenLDAPaci write (=wrscx)
> > by dn.base=CN=ADMIN,OU=ADMIN,O=SONERA,C=FI write (=wrscx)
> > by * read (=rscx)
> >
> >OpenLDAPaci is defined in core.schema
> >
> >I trid to use this way(ldif):
> >
> >dn: cn=+358408308432,ou=pcm,o=sonera,c=fi
> >add: OpenLDAPaci
> >aci:
> >1.2.3.4#enrty#grant:#rw#[all]#access-id#cn=phoenix,ou=admin,o=sonera,c=fi
> >
> >ldap_add: Undefined attribute type
> > additional info: attribute type undefined
> >
> >Do you the solution of this problem?
> >
> >regards: Szelei Gabor