[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: Transactions in LDAP
At 04:04 PM 9/18/00 -0400, Loth, Karen K (Karen) wrote:
>Kurt,
> A few questions about your transaction implementation.
It's doesn't exist. I'm working on a replacement backend which
will be designed to support such. Until I finish the replacement
backend, I won't start implementing LDAP transactions (as proposed
in my IETF draft).
>Do the LDAP transactions sit above a backend db's transaction processing?
I haven't decided how LDAP transactions will map on to DB transactions.
I am considering two different approaches:
1) start LDAP transaction starts a DB transaction
LDAP operations are "nested"
end LDAP transaction commits the DB transaction
2) start LDAP transaction initiates entry/CSN recording
LDAP operations are recorded with entry/CSN they act upon
but are NOT applied.
end transaction locks each entry, checks CSN, applies changes,
commits to DB.
There are obvious trade-offs. Likely I'll implement 1) as the
first cut, but I believe 2) is best as it avoid holding of
entry locks across multiple LDAP operations.
>For example say the client did something like this:
>txnID = beginTransaction()
> ldap_add_t()
> ldap_add_t()
> ldap_add_t()
>endTransaction()
>And the backend database is implemented in such a way that each add call is
>within a single database transaction. So the second ldap_add_t() fails,
>what will get rolled back? Will the LDAP server inform the backend database
>to delete (rollback) the first ldap_add_t()?
A transaction is the grouping of multiple operations into one atomic
action. Each of operation within the grouping must succeed or no
change is made to the data.
>Secondly, how are transactions going to be treated when a referral comes
>into play?
The operation will not be reviewed as being successful, the transaction
will not be applied.
>Does the transaction cross over to the new directory?
The mechanism is between an LDAP client and an LDAP server, so no.