[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: NIS scheme

To: Stig Venås <venaas@alfa.itea.ntnu.no>
Subject: Re: NIS scheme
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 06:40:14 -0700
Cc: Luke Howard <lukeh@PADL.COM>, kunkee@neosoft.com, openldap-devel@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <20000830112152.A8561@itea.ntnu.no>
References: <200007210924.TAA58570@au.padl.com> <4.3.2.7.0.20000720095957.00adc950@infidel.boolean.net> <4.3.2.7.0.20000720141502.00af5470@infidel.boolean.net> <200007210924.TAA58570@au.padl.com>

At 11:21 AM 8/30/00 +0200, Stig Venås wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 07:24:13PM +1000, Luke Howard wrote:
>> 
>> >I just took a quick look at the NIS schema.  It appears that
>> >only one routine needs to be implemented, a validator for
>> >syntax 1.3.6.1.1.1.0.0 (net group triple).  No normalizer
>> >is needed as no matching rules act upon values of this
>> >syntax.
>> 
>> And bootParameterSyntax, yes? This really needs to be done,
>> and I really should be doing it. :-) I'll see what I can
>> rustle up this weekend.
>
>Looks like you didn't get the time to do it, at least I can't
>find it in 2.0-gamma. Is anyone working on this? I might have
>a go myself, I've never looked at this before though, so it
>might be more than I can handle.

I added cheap NIS syntax validators to 2.X-devel (actually,
I just reused printableStringValidator).  Please test.
These should be replaced with real syntax validators by
some one....

References:
- Re: NIS scheme
  - From: Stig Venås <venaas@alfa.itea.ntnu.no>

Prev by Date: Re: NIS scheme
Next by Date: RE: Development snapshot tarball?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread