Re: OpenLDAP 2.0-alpha2

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

Sound a lot like our concurrency test.  Does our concurrency test
pass?

At 04:18 PM 8/25/99 +0200, Frédéric Poels wrote:
>At 14:39 25/08/99 +0200, I wrote:
>>Good afternoon!
>>
>>I've had the bad (or good?) idea to change some parameters of a
>>multi-threaded OpenLDAP 1.3.6 slapd server running on AIX 4.2.1:
>>cachesize=100
>>dbcachesize=200
>
>I did the same with OpenLDAP-2.0-alpha2...
>I also tried using a size greater than sizelimit (you never now).
>
>>The directory contains about 15000 entries. I perform the following
>>operations:
>>- A process forks 15 times, each son binds to the LDAP server and perform a
>>different search which returns about 1000 entries. The father waits for its
>>sons to terminate and then exits.
>>- It works pretty well :o)
>>- I do it again
>>- All sons return "No such object" :o(
>>- Any request sent to the LDAP server fail with the "No such object" reason
>>code :o/
>
>Same behaviour.

Any clues in the server logs?

Kurt