[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#6645) Yet Another LDIF Wrap Patch
masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote:
> Full_Name: Pierangelo Masarati
> Version: HEAD/re24
> OS: irrelevant
> URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/pierangelo-masarati-2010-09-09-ldif-wrap.1.patch
> Submission from: (NULL) (129.72.165.135)
> Submitted by: ando
>
>
> The subject should be self-explanatory. It is only exploited by slapcat, via
> the -o ldif-wrap=<n> option (<n> < 0: default;<n> == 0: no wrap;<n> > 0: wrap
> value); extending ldapsearch is trivial.
>
> I'm *NOT* going to commit this unless there is unanimous consensus ;)
Not thrilled with the magic constant 2^31-1. Seems like you should have just
used "if ( wrap && len > wrap )" instead of a word-size-dependent magic.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/