[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#6334) hang during ldapmodify



Matthew,

Sorry, I forgot to include the slapd server log as requested.

> This looks like you added -d to your ldapmodify.  More useful here would
> be server logs; try running slapd with -d 263 so we can see more of what
> the server is trying. (1+2+4+256)

Oct 19 12:08:02 server slapd[15863]: @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.4.19 (Oct
15 2009 16:33:37) $
^Imkd@build:/sysvol/ldap/src/openldap-2.4.19/servers/slapd
Oct 19 12:08:04 server slapd[15863]: slapd starting
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 fd=13 ACCEPT from
IP=<IP>:34472 (IP=<IP>:63600)
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 fd=13 TLS established
tls_ssf=128 ssf=128
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=0 SRCH base="" scope=0
deref=0 filter="(objectClass=*)"
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=0 SRCH
attr=supportedSASLMechanisms
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=0 SEARCH RESULT tag=101
err=0 nentries=1 text=
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=1 BIND dn="" method=163
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=14
text=SASL(0): successful result: security flags do not match required
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=2 BIND dn="" method=163
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=2 RESULT tag=97 err=14
text=SASL(0): successful result: security flags do not match required
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: connection_input: conn=0 deferring
operation: binding
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=3 BIND dn="" method=163
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=3 BIND
authcid="user/root@cs.brown.edu" authzid="user/root@cs.brown.edu"
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=3 BIND
dn="uid=user/root,cn=cs.brown.edu,cn=gssapi,cn=auth" mech=GSSAPI
sasl_ssf=56 ssf=128
Oct 19 12:08:08 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 op=3 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
Oct 19 12:11:57 server slapd[15863]: conn=0 fd=13 closed (connection lost)

Unfortunately, it doesn't provide much information at this debug level,
should I crank it up further?

Thanks,

Mark