[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ITS#5925
ando@sys-net.it wrote:
> If it works, then we still have an issue: operations for "o=1,o=2" will
> probably be intercepted by the back-bdb. However, I understand that
> since the first database is glued, it wants to know whom it's glued to.
A fix is in HEAD. It will allow this scenario to succeed, but it will also
allow completely broken subordinate configs to be dynamically created in
cn=config. (configs read from slapd.conf/slapd.d will still be error checked
appropriately.) As such, it needs a bit more thought.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/